Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Lumber Co. v. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railway & Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Iron. (Stone, J.) Bill to correct a contract for the purchase of timber. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Complainant’s bill is filed to correct a contract for the purchase of timber, by adding to it the description of certain lands which is claimed to have been omitted by mistake. The negotiations took place in Chicago, between the presidents of the corporations, complainant and defendant. The contract conveying the timber was subsequently prepared by defendant’s counsel in Michigan, and was afterwards signed by the respective parties. Upon discovering the omission, which discovery was made some time after the contract was signed by complainant’s president, defendant was asked to correct the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Climer v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Toll v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kimble v. HarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Backus v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lyons v. ChafeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lane v. NeifertMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hogan v. SwayzeUtah Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API