Kimble v. Harrington
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Jackson. - (Peck, J.) Bill to reform and foreclose a mortgage. Defendant McCain appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainant filed a bill in the circuit court of Jackson county, in chancery, to reform a mortgage, and to foreclose as reformed. The defendant McCain holds a second mortgage covering the same property, including that which is claimed to have been omitted by mistake from complainant’s mortgage.
*282The facts are that the defendant Harrington owned and occupied a farm in Spring Arbor' township, which was covered by a previous mortgage to complainant. The mortgage in suit was given as a renewal of a former mortgage, and was intended to cover the same land. By mistake in drafting the same, one 40 of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lane v. NeifertMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Metropolitan Lumber Co. v. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railway & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Judson v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Kelly v. IsraelMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Bronk v. Standard Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905