Aldridge v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction for aggravated assault, robbery, and kidnapping, Jamarole Aldridge argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove venue and kidnapping and that the trial court erred in its charge concerning venue and in failing to merge the robbery and kidnapping convictions. We find no error and affirm.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” Reese v. State, 270 Ga. App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). We neither weigh the evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Drinkard v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Horne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Davis v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Jamarole Aldridge v. Scott CrickmarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Kristin Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019