Legal Opinion
Heather Dieffenbach v. Barnes & Noble
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 11, 2018No. 17-2408PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Easterbrook, Circuit Judge.
In 2012 Barnes & Noble discovered that scoundrels had compromised some of the machines, called PIN pads, that it used to verify payment information. They acquired details such as customers' names, card numbers and expiration dates, and PINs. Some customers temporarily lost the use of their funds while waiting for banks to reverse unauthorized charges to their accounts. Some spent money on credit-monitoring services to protect their financial interests. Some lost the value of their time devoted to acquiring new account numbers and notifying businesses of these…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Jennifer Miller v. Southwest Airlines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Customer Data SEC. Breach Litig. Melissa Alleruzzo v. Supervalu, Inc. (In Re Supervalu, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Bohnak v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- I Tan Tsao v. Captiva MVP Restaurant Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Webb v. Injured Workers Pharmacy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.