Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Peltz v. Brewster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

The court below held that the commitment of the relator was unlawful, but dismissed the Writ of habeas corpus and remanded her to the custody of the sheriff with directions to proceed in accordance with section 227 of the State Charities Law, by taking relator before a city magistrate to be dealt with as though she had not been previously committed. The writ was sued out to procure relator’s release from the State Reformatory for Women at Bedford to which she had been committed by a magistrate for an indeterminate period not to exceed three years under section 913-c of the Code of Criminal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SteinmetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. People Ex Rel. Danziger v. Protestant Episcopal House of MercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. People v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. People Ex Rel. Sabatino v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. People ex rel. Deordio v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SarraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Campbell v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. United States ex rel. Mason v. HuntDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  4. People ex rel. Shakur v. McGrathNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API