Legal Opinion

United States v. Fjermestad

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 17, 1967No. 20,393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The issue in this ease is whether the president of the special court-martial which tried the accused erred prej-udicially in failing to note that the inclusion of a bad-conduct discharge in the sentence was possible only because “the authorized confinement without substitution for such offenses is six months or more.” Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 127c, section B. Our decision in United States v Yocom, 17 USCMA 270, 38 CMR 68, this day decided, governs the question.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. YocomUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  2. United States v. NelsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. FjermestadUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API