United States v. Fjermestad
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Ferguson, Judge:
The issue in this ease is whether the president of the special court-martial which tried the accused erred prej-udicially in failing to note that the inclusion of a bad-conduct discharge in the sentence was possible only because “the authorized confinement without substitution for such offenses is six months or more.” Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, paragraph 127c, section B. Our decision in United States v Yocom, 17 USCMA 270, 38 CMR 68, this day decided, governs the question.
The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. YocomUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. NelsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. FjermestadUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968