Legal Opinion
United States v. Jerry Mack Malcolm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1973No. 72-2183PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Malcolm appeals from his conviction for armed bank robbery. (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (d).)
The only contested factual issue at trial was his sanity at the time of the offense. Over his objection, the district court admitted the testimony of a psychiatrist who had examined him pursuant to a pretrial order compelling him to submit to an examination to ascertain his sanity at the time of the offense. Malcolm contends that the court erred in admitting the testimony because the pretrial order was invalid on statutory and constitutional grounds and that, even if the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Jerry Neale AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Ronald Thomas BohleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Thomas E. Blunt v. United States of America, Thomas E. Blunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Bruce Carneil Webster, A/K/A B-LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Aleksandrs v. LaurinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Karen Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police Department City of Los Angeles James J. King Stanley A. SchottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.