Legal Opinion
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. Purdy
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 27, 2005No. CIV. 03-6472MJDJGLPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order to Show Cause and for Clarification of Injunction. [Docket No. 91] Defendant William Purdy also filed a third motion requesting recusal of Judge Michael Davis. [Docket No. Ill] The Court heard oral argument on March 7, 2005.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Procedural Background
Plaintiffs Faegre & Benson, LLP (“Faegre”), Felicia Boyd, and John H. Hinderaker filed a complaint against William S. Purdy, Sr., Please Don’t KILL Your Baby (“PDKYB”), and Does 1-10, on December 15,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Paccar Inc. v. Telescan Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hubbard Feeds, Inc. v. Animal Feed Supplement, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Cliffs Notes, Inc. v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- M.A. ex rel P.K. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011
- United States v. Open Access Technology International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Martin v. Living Essentials, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Faegre & Benson, LLP v. PurdyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.