Legal Opinion
Yox v. Durgan
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 30, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 893PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The Court has heretofore expressed the tentative opinion that there has been insufficient substituted service of process on the defendant, who has appeared specially through counsel for the sole purpose of contesting the acquisition of in personam jurisdiction over him by this Court, to satisfy the requirements of due process of law. See memorandum opinion of May 9, 1969, D.C., 298 F.Supp. 1365. Following oral argu*1263merits on this motion and the motion of the plaintiffs for a judgment by default herein on June 3, 1969, Rule 55(a), Federal Rules…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hendershot v. FerkelOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Fernandez v. ChamberlainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Williams v. EganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Yox v. DurganDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
- Greenwood v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- World Publishing Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Nikwei v. Ross School of Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Nikwei v. Ross School Of AviationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Solida v. LedfordDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1977
- World Publishing Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001