Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Jones

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1943No. 4752PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The defendant (appellee here) recovered judgment below on a cross complaint filed against plaintiffs, who sought recovery from defendant on a promissory note representing the balance of the purchase price of a bull sold for breeding purposes. Plaintiffs sold defendant the bull on May 15, 1939, for the agreed price of $85, of which $50 was paid in cash and the balance evidenced by defendant’s promissory note due six months after date.

The plaintiffs represented and warranted to defendant at the time of the sale, as found by the trial court, that “the bull so sold was a good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nikolich v. Slovenska Nardona Podporna JednotaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wiggins v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Pauls Valley Milling Co. v. GabbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
  2. Selgado v. Commercial Warehouse CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Otero v. WheelerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Montoya v. Super Save Warehouse FoodsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. New Mexico v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API