Legal Opinion

State v. Nagel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1986No. 2100PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, P.J.

Defendant-appellant, Carl Nagel, appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a prohibited blood-alcohol content pursuant to R.C. 4511.19 (A)(1) and (3). This court affirms.

Nagel was stopped on U.S. 250 by State Trooper S. C. Sherrod at about 10:45 p.m., March 24, 1985. The officer observed him traveling at about thirty-five to forty miles per hour in a fifty-five mile per hour zone and weaving both within his lane and across the center line. When the officer activated his overhead lights to pull him over, Nagel stopped in the center passing lane.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. WitteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. State v. MurphyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Young v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API