Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Britton & Koontz Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 15, 2011No. 2009-CA-01798-COAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Under Rule 54(b) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, a summary-judgment order that disposes less than all claims or parties is interlocutory, absent the trial court’s express determination *1131there is not reason for delay and explicit direction to enter a final judgment. Carolyn Anderson appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Britton & Koontz Bank, N.A. and Britton & Koontz Capital Corporation (collectively B & K Bank). Anderson had sued two defendants, B & K Bank and E.A. Redd Pest Control, Inc. (Redd Pest Control), but the summary-judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ind. Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. v. Curtis MathesMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Williams v. Delta Regional Medical CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Miller v. Continental Mineral ProcessingCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
  4. Lloyd G. Oliphant & Sons Paint Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chevis v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  2. Thompson v. TRUE TEMPER SPORTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  3. Bell v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  4. Meekins v. KennonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  5. Chevis v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API