Murphy v. Sloan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
In this case we consider the significance of a “trial period” of residence on a child’s “habitual residence” under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. 1 Elaine Murphy seeks the return of her child, E.S., to Ireland. We affirm the judgment of the district court that E.S. was a habitual resident of the United States, where she presently resides with her father, William Sloan.
Background 2
Sloan, a citizen of the United States, and Murphy, a citizen of Ireland, were married in California in 2000. They lived together in Mill…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robert v. TessonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Yossi Gitter, in the Matter of Eden Moshe Gitter: Infant Under the Age of 16 v. Miriam GitterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Milla Karkkainen v. Vladimir Ivanovich Kovalchuk Julie L. D'ItrICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Asvesta v. PetroutsasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Andreas Carlwig v. Sarodjiny CarlwigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sundberg v. BaileyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Adkins v. AdkinsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Akwasi Asumadu v. Hannah BaffoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Amsalem v. AmsalemDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.