Bettendorf v. St. Croix County
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHamilton, Circuit Judge
I agree with my colleagues that plaintiff Bettendorf has no viable due process claim here, and I join those portions of Judge Bauer’s opinion. I respectfully dissent, however, from my colleagues’ decision to affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs takings claim under state law.
The majority’s decision gives our court’s approval, on bare pleadings, to a rare and extraordinary burden on property rights. The majority is saying that a local government can first designate a lawful use of property, allowing a property owner to make substantial investments in the property and to use it that way for more…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.