Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Early

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1924No. 6805PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether an allowance of $1,000 as compensation to the receiver, appointed to take charge of the property sought to be partitioned in the above-styled suit by the heirs of J. R. Adams, is excessive and out of all fair and just proportion to the value and character of the services rendered.

J. E. Mercer, a practicing attorney, was appointed receiver of the property of J. R. Adams, deceased, partitioned in this suit, on July 5, 1920, and served until his final report, January 15, 1923. The principal estate of J. R. Adams as partitioned consisted of 100…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Supply Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Roberts v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Mid-Continent Supply Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API