Legal Opinion

Doreika v. Blotner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 2008No. A08A0585PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a professional negligence case in which Paul Doreika alleged that he sustained serious injuries as a result of chiropractor *851Gregg Blotner’s treatment. Doreika specifically asserted that Blot-ner failed to inform him about the risks of neck adjustments or treatment alternatives for his neck before performing a neck adjustment which either caused a herniated disc or aggravated a preexisting disc condition. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Blotner. Doreika appeals, alleging the trial court erred in refusing to give requested jury charges regarding the law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Nathans v. DiamondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Albany Urology Clinic, P.C. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Zant v. PrevatteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Fowler v. GorrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Camden County v. HaddockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Blotner v. DoreikaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. AMERICAN MATERIAL SERVICES, INC. v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Blotner v. DoreikaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Blotner v. DoreikaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API