Legal Opinion
Dutch Maid Laundry, Inc. v. Euler
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1933No. Equity No. 56130Published
1Opinion of the Court
*90FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
OPINION
ADKINS, J.
The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:'
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Prior to 1932 defendant Julius M. Euler was employed as driver by the Quality Laundry Company doing business in the District of Columbia. Messrs. Ernest S. Churbuck and Charles W. Litchfield, partners, were engaged in the laundry business in the District of Columbia under the name of Dutch Maid Laundry Company.
2. Prior to 1932 said partners operating the Dutch Maid Laundry employed said Euler as driver for their laundry. Euler acting for the Dutch Maid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Price v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. HeldtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. PriggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Muesling v. International Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914
- Red Star Yeast & Products Co. v. HagueOhio Court of Appeals · 1927