Legal Opinion

Wood v. Myrup

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1984No. 18757PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This case involves questions of trespass, quiet title, and boundary by acquiescence.

The parties own adjoining property in North Salt Lake. Plaintiffs Critchley purchased the property to the north in 1948. In 1971, they sold the western 414 feet to the predecessors of plaintiffs Wood, keeping the eastern 141 feet. Defendants Myr-up have owned the property to the south since before 1945. In 1945, defendants built a fence of wood posts and wire from the western end of their property about 80 percent of the way along what they assumed to be their northern boundary. There was no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. King v. FronkUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hobson v. Panguitch Lake CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ekberg v. BatesUtah Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stevensen v. GoodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cornish Town v. KollerUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ames v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. Anderson v. FautinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API