Legal Opinion

Portel v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 7, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This is a suit in admiralty brought under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq. Libellant, an employee of Zalud Marine Corporation, sues the United States of America for personal injuries alleging that it failed to furnish him with a safe place to work. The United States answered and impleaded Zalud Marine, claiming the accident was caused solely by the latter’s negligence and, in any event, that the United States is entitled to indemnity or contribution. By stipulation the question of indemnity in so far as it arises under the terms of a written…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. The ChattahoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Guerrini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Elston v. Industrial Lift Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Ahlgren v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Hawn v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Baccile v. Halcyon LinesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API