People v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*225OPINION OF THE COURT
Mahoney, P. J.
Initially, defendant contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel when the trial court denied his motion for a continuance, resulting in the trial commencing the same day that his omnibus motion was denied. Defendant theorizes that his attorney was compelled to proceed to trial without an opportunity to assess the impact of the court’s ruling. Trial counsel had, however, represented defendant for at least two months prior to trial and during that period he had prepared motion papers and conducted a suppression hearing. There was ample…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. TannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Di Lorenzo v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. DennisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. Reilly, New York County Courts1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Grady v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- People v. TelfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Vaughan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ScattareggiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. IrvingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.