Legal Opinion
Talmadge v. Cordell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 12, 1930No. 7096PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
This is the second appearance of this case in this court. See Talmadge v. Cordell, 167 Ga. 594 (146 S. E. 467), where the facts then appearing are sufficiently set out in the report. In an amendment to his petition, filed on July 20, 1928, Cordell alleged, in the 4th paragraph, that defendant as Commissioner of Agriculture had given certificates to six individuals, the exact terms of which Cordell could not allege, for the reason that the certificates were not in his possession, but the substance of which was that said individuals were authorized to inspect fertilizers until further notice…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Talmadge v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Kingsbery v. RyanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Maddox v. Anchor Duck MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- City of Camilla v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Bond v. MunroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- City of Atlanta v. McLennanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Stanley v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Talmadge v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- A. H. Friedman, Inc. v. Augusta Burglar Alarm Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.