Legal Opinion

Jessie v. Boynton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1977PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

On September 9,1974, the members of the defendant Jordan Hospital Corporation (hospital) purported to adopt new corporate by-laws which provided, for the first time, that employees of the hospital, their spouses, and children constitute a separate class of members ineligible to vote. The plaintiffs brought this proceeding to challenge the propriety of the purported by-law change. We conclude that the members lawfully could vote on the proposed by-laws at the September 9 meeting but that the plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts to state a claim that the practices followed by the defendants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Friedman v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. American Tube Works v. Boston Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Massachusetts Charitable Mechanic Ass'n v. BeedeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Chokel v. Genzyme Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Rafferty v. Sancta Maria HospitalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  4. Saint Louis v. Baystate Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  5. Bello v. South Shore HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API