Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Valkenberg v. Venters

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 1948No. 32711Published

1DissentGibson, J.

I am of the view that the judgment should be reversed because it is not sustained by any evidence.

Introduced in evidence were the proceedings before the justice of the peace and the testimony of the plaintiff. Such proceedings included the verified complaint, which averred generally an unlawful withholding of possession after peaceable entry; a thirty-day notice to terminate a tenancy, therein stated to be from month to month, with return of service thereon; notice to quit and return of service; and certificate of Rent Director in Office of Price Administration of U. S. A., authorizing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Wilson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Showalter v. RylesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Turnbaugh v. HusseltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API