Legal Opinion
Keeler v. Joy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 9, 1981No. Nos. 117-118, Dockets 80-7359, 80-7362PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge:
New York City’s Rent and Rehabilitation Law, Title Y, § Y51-1.0 et seq., Administrative Code of the City of New York, prescribes a procedure through which a landlord, seeking to reclaim a rent controlled apartment for his own use, may, by application to the City, evict a tenant. The issue in this case is whether the notice and conference afforded a tenant by the City satisfy the demands of due process. The trial court held that they do and granted summary judgment for the City against the tenants.1 We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The relevant part of the Rent and Rehabilitation Law…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Keeler v. JoyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Bank Co. v. BrumbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Sterling v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Engblom v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Brody v. MoanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Stavisky v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.