People v. Timmons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to suppress the identification testimony of the victim was properly denied. "Accidental or unarranged showups at the police station are not unnecessarily or impermissibly suggestive when they are unavoidable and not attributable to any misconduct on the part of the police or the prosecutor” (People v Sims, 150 AD2d 402, 404, Iv denied 74 NY2d 747). The trial court responded meaningfully to the jury’s inquiry regarding the definition of felony murder (see, People v Weinberg, 83 NY2d 262, 267; People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 131).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ChinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. WeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006