MATTER OF DOLOMITE PRODS. CO., INC. v. Kipers
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at the Appellate Division. As that opinion demonstrates, the record makes it clear that the appellant carried on no quarrying operations in parcels B and 0 since it acquired those properties more than 40 years ago. And, contrary to the intimations in the dissenting opinion, the appellant, as the Appellate Division pointed out, offered no proof either (1) “ as to the financial loss it may suffer ” (23 A D 2d, p. 342); (2) or “ as to the value of the land in parcels B and C which * * * are apparently good residential…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rachman Bag Company, a Partnership Composed of Plains Bag and Bagging Co., Inc., and Rachman Bag Co., Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.