Holt v. Holt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Plaintiffs complaint alleges that defendants, his brothers, breached a family settlement agreement. Defendants moved for and were granted summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. We consider first whether plaintiffs relinquishment of his right to caveat a codicil to his mother’s will in which codicil he was left nothing may, in the absence of a bona fide dispute as to the codicil’s validity, constitute consideration for defendants’ promise to distribute a portion of their property given under the codicil to plaintiff. We hold that it may not. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Rutledge v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Preston v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. DallasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Adams v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Matter of Estate of OutenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In The Matter of The Estate Rex FeltenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025
- Lail v. TuckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.