Legal Opinion · Dissent

Findlay v. Duthuit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1982Published

1Dissent

Kupferman, J. P.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: If a cause of action is placed in the wrong cubbyhole, then the legal conclusion can be erroneous, which is the trouble with the majority memorandum in this matter. The defendant is the daughter of Henri Matisse, the great French painter, and issues certificates of authenticity for Matisse works pursuant to the French law droit moral. (Cf. Berne Convention, Paris Revision, 1971, art 6Bis; Copinger & Skone James, Copyright [Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1980], § 1829.) The specific right involved is Droit de la Paternite, the right of authorship…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Ehrlich-Bober & Co. v. University of HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Sybron Corp. v. WetzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Saunders v. KlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API