Legal Opinion
Application of Ostermann
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 2, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5628PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims numbered 7, 9, 10, 13, 16, and 19-24 in appellants’ application for a patent for an improvement in a core blowing machine and for. the cartridge used in the machine. Claims 15 and 18 for the cartridge were allowed by the Board of Appeals.
The following references were relied upon:
“Campbell 1,447,376 Mar. 6, 1923
Campbell 1,594,598 Aug. 3, 1926
Candler 1,703,708 Feb. 26, 1929
Meyer 1,927,571 Sept. 19, 1933
Romph 1,950,632 Mar.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In re LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In re NelsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re RaticanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1910
- In re KinneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Stearns v. RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955