Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Morgan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM MORGAN Appeal from the Circuiut Court of Morgan County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and hy certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court.— XeN Hicks, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

delivered the opinion of the Court.. This suit was brought by Morgan to recover damages for personal injuries; the action being founded *29on the federal Employers’ Liability Act. He was granted a judgment based on the verdict of a jury in the. circuit court, after a motion of the defendant railway company for peremptory instructions had been overruled. On appeal the court of civil appeals, reversing the judgment, sustained the motion for instructed verdict, and dismissed the suit.

A petition for certiorari was filed by Morgan under which we ordered and have heard oral argument.

An underlying…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prince v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Clements v. Nashville C. & St. L. Ry.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API