Legal Opinion

Brustin v. Lodge Corp.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 24, 1998No. 961140PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.

The defendant Dallamora Realty (“Dallamora”) has moved for summary judgment under Mass.R.Civ.R 56(c) on Count IV of the Complaint, the only count in the Complaint directed against Dallamora, alleging intentional interference with contract. For the reasons stated below, Dallamora’s motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED as to Count IV of the Complaint.

BACKGROUND

In evaluating a summary judgment claim, I am obliged to rely only on facts not in dispute and disputed facts viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment, which in this case is the plaintiff, Marilyn Brustin…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. G.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Falmouth Marine, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Beal v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Balyozian v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API