Legal Opinion

Raach v. Haverly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1978No. 47676, 47738PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Cass County District Court denying appellants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial and from the underlying judgment in favor of respon dents for 1150,00o. 1 Appellants are real estate agents who were found liable by a jury for misrepresentations made during the sale of a resort in Crow Wing County. We affirm the actions of the trial court.

Darrell D. Haverly and his wife bought the resort, which they named “Cap’n Dee’s Piney Ridge Lodge,” in 1965 from a man named Roberts, whose real estate agent was Lawrence…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Lewis v. Citizens Agency of Madelia, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commercial Property Investments, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Quality Inns International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Lengyel v. LintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Hommerding v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Nerenhausen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API