Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 24, 1981No. 78-3523-HPPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DIRECTED VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-COMPLAINANT ON SINGLE ENTITY ISSUE

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.

This matter is before the court on cross-motions filed, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a), by the plaintiff Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission, the cross-claimant Oakland Raiders, and the NFL defendants, seeking entry of a directed verdict with respect to the defendants’ contention that the NFL is a single economic entity for purposes of this lawsuit and hence cannot as a matter of law have violated section 1 of the Sherman Act. Having studied the parties’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. McNeil v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  3. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Highwood Service, Inc., Empire Sports, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, Inc., and Chargers Football Company, Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., and Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants, and Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Defendant/cross-Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc., Intervenor/defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross-Claimant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API