Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Rowand MacHinery Co.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1986No. 16131PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal presents questions of proximate cause and damages. The appellant, Glendora Crosby, has suffered a tragic series of misfortunes — the death of her husband, the burning of her ranch house, the repossession of a tractor, the forced sale of some cattle, and the near loss of her entire ranch by a sheriff’s sale. In this lawsuit she alleges that Rowand Machinery contributed to her problems by slandering title to her ranch. However, the district court found that Rowand’s conduct did not proximately cause any damages claimed by Mrs. Crosby. With the exception of nominal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Linscott v. Rainier National Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Village of Peck v. DenisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Munson v. State, Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Davis v. GageIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McPheters v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Trees v. KerseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Harwood v. TalbertIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wiggins v. Peachtree Settlement Funding (In Re Wiggins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API