Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Sinking Fund v. Ristine

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

This was a proceeding to obtain a mandate *346against Ristine, as Auditor, to compel him to issue a warrant on the Treasurer of State, to obtain the payment of the semiannual interest upon certain pai'ts of the public debt.

There was a demurrer sustained to the complaint. • Judgrnent for the defendant.

The allegations in the complaint were substantially the same with those set forth in a case, at this term, between the same parties, but appearing to have been decided differently below. .

Of course those to whom the interest is near due, are anxious to receive the same. The officers of State, through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scobey v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Blaine County Investment Co. v. GalletIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Beazley's Adm'r v. Sims' Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API