Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarence Arnold

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1970No. 656-69_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 331 (q) (1), the unlawful manufacture, compounding and processing of a depressant or stimulant drug. His appellate contentions include an assertion that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction and broad generalizations concerning the jury panel and the refusal of the trial court to grant a motion for continuance. Each of these contentions was presented to the trial court by way of motion for new trial and held to lack merit. We are in complete agreement that the record reflects more than ample evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. William Rensler NolanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Loy Lavator Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. David Joe MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. HaidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. United States v. Patrick C. Remigio, A/K/A Joe CuervoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Raymond Nelson LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Matthew Johnson v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API