South Memphis Land Co. v. Memphis Interurban Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY Appeal from the Cliancery Court of Slielby County. —E. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
The bill alleges that complainant, being the owner of a large body of land lying immediately south of the corporate limits of the city of Memphis, which had been platted into several subdivisions, conveyed, on the 28th day of February, 1909, a right of way over and across its lands to the Lakeview Traction Company, and that contemporaneously therewith a contract was entered into between the parties which, with the deed for the right of way, constitute one instrument. The deed for the right of way reads:
‘ ‘ That for and in consideration of the sum of $5, and and other good and valuable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Sohier v. Trinity ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Clapp v. WilderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Episcopal City Mission v. AppletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farrar v. N. C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931