City of Birmingham v. Graffeo
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
551 So.2d 357 (1989)
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, a municipal corporation
v.
Michael G. GRAFFEO.
88-1525.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 19, 1989.
Donald V. Watkins and Joe R. Whatley, Jr. of Cooper, Mitch, Crawford, Kuykendall & Whatley, Birmingham, for appellant.
J. Scott Greene of Bishop, Colvin & Johnson, Birmingham, for appellee.
2Per curiam
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the City of Birmingham, acting pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 11-43-63, was authorized to enact Ordinance No. 89-46, which effectively removed Michael G. Graffeo, an elected City Council member, from office before the end of his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Williams v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama v. NielsenDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- St. Clair County Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1544, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 132 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. John O. Nielsen, D.M.D., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Who Are Similarly Situated, Kenneth O. Friday, George R. Bolling, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Intervenor-Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants, Complete Health, Inc., Samuel W. Sullivan, M.D., MovantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.