Legal Opinion

Parmelee v. O'Neel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2010No. 82128-3PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 This case allows us to consider whether a litigant who is successful in getting an appellate court to vacate a penal infraction and to declare a Washington statute unconstitutional is a prevailing party under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) entitled to attorney fees. Allan Parmelee, a prisoner in the custody of Clallam Bay Corrections Center (CBCC), received an infraction for inflammatory language in a letter that complained about the treatment of prisoners at the facility. The Court of Appeals vacated the infraction after ruling that the Washington criminal libel statute, former RCW 9.58.010 (1935),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. P.E. Systems, LLC v. CPI Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Parmelee v. O'NEELWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ryan v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Osborne v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API