Osborne v. Seymour
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
¶1 Tom Seymour appeals the trial court’s (1) grant of partial summary judgment to Krista Osborne, holding him liable for violating her Fourth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) denial of his cross motion and all defendants’ summary judgment motion to dismiss Osborne’s § 1983 claim against him, based on qualified immunity; and (3) award of attorney fees and costs of *826$340,654.14 against him. We affirm the trial court’s summary judgment rulings. We vacate the trial court’s award of attorney fees and costs and remand to the trial court to reduce the award to include the attorney fees…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayes v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Gardner v. First Heritage BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Karanjah v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Janice Rios-negron v. Pedro Gadiel Figueroa VaragasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Jdh Cranberries, Llc v. James J. O'hagan, Et UxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.