Legal Opinion
Cangrade, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 16, 2026No. 5:25-cv-01381Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CANGRADE, INC., Case No. 25-cv-01381-NW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS OR STRIKE 10 SYNOPSYS, INC., Re: ECF No. 68 Defendant. 11 12 13 On September 5, 2025, Defendant Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) filed a motion to dismiss 14 Plaintiff Cangrade, Inc.’s (“Cangrade”) second amended complaint. ECF No. 68.1 Having 15 considered the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes oral argument is 16 not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.