Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Connecticut General Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The challenged judgment was entered on a directed verdict in favor of defendant. The pleaded cause of action is grounded upon a policy of insurance issued by defendant, indemnifying plaintiff “against loss resulting directly, and independently of all other causes, from bodily injuries effected solely through accidental means.” Plaintiff fell or was thrown under the wheels of a train of the Erie Railroad Company, at its Arlington station, and suffered the loss of both feet. The indemnity provided by the policy for such an injury was the sum of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Warner v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bullowa v. Thermoid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HollowaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zurich, C., Co., Ltd. v. American Mutual, C., CoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Schneider v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Mancuso v. RothenbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Shapiro Bros. Factors Corp. v. Automobile Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
  5. Clark-McCaffrey, Etc., Co. v. Nat. Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API