Tilghman v. Werk
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
In Equity. Application for leave to file hill of review.
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
The motions made herein by complainant and respondents should each be severally denied.
*6811. The motion of respondents for a-nunc pro tunc order dismissing the complainant’s application or petition to vacate the decree herein of April 9, 1878, and for a rehearing of the cause, based upon the alleged action or opinion taken or expressed by the circuit judge at Knoxville, Tenn., on the 29th day of July, 1884, when said petition was heard by him, should be refused, because that action or opinion of the circuit judge never assumed the form of the final decision or judgment of this court, wherein the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Mitchell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Wiser v. BlachlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Royal v. RoyalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. McSherry Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.