Legal Opinion

Nordstrom v. Wauconda National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 9, 1996No. 2951221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiffs, Lauren Nordstrom and Nordstrom Tree Experts, Inc., appeal the dismissal of the two counts of their complaint which were directed against defendant, Wauconda National Bank. The court dismissed the counts because it found that they were barred by the Illinois Credit Agreements Act (Act) (815 ILCS 160/1 et seq. (West 1994)). See 735 ILCS 5/2 — 619(a)(9) (West 1994). Defendant Fogelson Development Corp. is not a party to this appeal. Plaintiffs raise the following issues for review: whether the Act precludes a claim of promissory estoppel; and whether the Act is unconstitutional…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Calloway v. KinkelaarIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nevitt v. LangfelderIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Eagan v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Village of Vernon Hills v. Vernon Fire Protection DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Help at Home, Incorporated v. Medical Capital, L.L.C., D/B/A MedcapCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. R & B Kapital Development, LLC v. North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Bank One, Springfield v. RoscettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Bank One v. RoscettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API