Legal Opinion

NJ Mort. & Invest. Corp. v. Young

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 23, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

134 N.J. Super. 392 (1975)

341 A.2d 360

NEW JERSEY MORTGAGE AND INVESTMENT CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JOE YOUNG AND LILLIE MAE YOUNG, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided May 23, 1975.

Mr. William Furst, attorney for plaintiff

DWYER, J.S.C.

Subsequent to default being entered against Joe and Lillie Mae Young (defendants), New Jersey Mortgage and Investment Corp. (plaintiff), assignee of a consumer note executed by defendants on February 22, 1973 in connection with a home repair contract made with Berkeley Priorities Corp., applied for an order for entry…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Metric Investment, Inc. v. PattersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Block v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Metric Investment, Inc. v. PattersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Center Grove Associates v. HoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. First Morris Bank and Trust v. Roland Offset Service, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Adco Service, Inc. v. Graphic Color PlateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API