Legal Opinion · Concurrence

District of Columbia v. Mark Grimes

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 28, 1968No. 21555Published

1Concurrence

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge

(concurring):

Judge McGowan sets forth persuasively the historical facts translatable into an appeal for maintenance of the prosecutorial status quo in Section 22-1107 disorderly conduct cases. For me, however, the considerations delineated in Judge Tamm’s opinion, in which I concur, provide the edge in the resolution of the close question which was certified to us. The District cannot, in my view, assume the litigatory helm in such cases without colliding head-on with our holdings in Strothers1 *and Moody,2 which I am unable to comfortably…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Frank A. Tate v. United States of America, Robert M. Edelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. Archie Bradsher Davis v. Peerless Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Morton v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  5. Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API