Legal Opinion

Archie Bradsher Davis v. Peerless Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 21, 1958No. 14167_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

The District Judge, having concluded that a judgment in excess of $3,000 would not be justified, entered an order certifying to the Municipal Court for trial, 1 the appellant’s action brought upon an attachment bond in the penal sum of $8,400. 2 Appellant argues here that the District Judge misapprehended the basis of his claim and applied an erroneous rule of law in deciding that appellant could not recover damages in excess of $3,000. We will set forth the facts in juxtaposition to the points under consideration.

Appellee, of course, asks us to affirm the order of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. National Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Shaw-Walker Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Perez v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. W. B. Moses & Sons v. LockwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. De Rodulfa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Sheila Payne, Next Best Friend of Franklin Payne, a Minor v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. David Lee Den Hartigh v. John Latin, Jr. Michael H. Marsh v. Walter W. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Tyler v. Central Charge Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API