Legal Opinion

Victor v. Reynolds

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 11, 2025No. 1:20-cv-13218Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL VICTOR, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-13218 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendant. __________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR TAXATION OF COSTS After this Court granted judgment as a matter of law in Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare (ACH)’s favor, it filed a bill of costs and a Motion for the Taxation of Costs under Civil Rule 54. But this Motion is unnecessary. By filing a bill…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Bdt Products, Inc. Buro-Datentechnik Gmbh & Company Kg v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. 1704 Farmington, LLC v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API