Legal Opinion

People v. Concepcion

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After a suppression hearing, the Supreme Court concluded that the People failed to establish that the defendant consented to a search of his vehicle, from which the police seized a quantity of cocaine, but that the cocaine would have been inevitably discovered during an inventory search. However, as the People correctly concede, the inevitable discovery doctrine may not be applied to primary evidence, that is, the very cocaine recovered from the defendant’s vehicle (see People v Turriago, 90 NY2d 77, 86 [1997]; People v Stith, 69 NY2d 313, 318 [1987]; People v Solano, 148 AD2d 761, 763…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. TurriagoNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. StithNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ConcepcionNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. ConcepcionNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. NewsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. NewsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API