Legal Opinion
Buster v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 23, 1992No. C14-91-00843-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Justice.
The sole issue on appeal is whether a judgment by the probate court precluded Metropolitan Transit Authority (appellee) from litigating or contesting the issue of the existence of a common law marriage between James Buster and Kathy Anne Espy. The trial court determined that ap-pellee was not precluded from litigating the issue and based upon the stipulated facts, ordered that James Buster recover nothing from appellee. We affirm.
On August 24, 1989, James Buster (appellant) was riding as a passenger in a vehicle driven by Kathy Anne Espy (Espy) when it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bonniwell v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Brown v. Edwards Transfer Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Texas Real Estate Commission v. NagleTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Garza v. Maverick Market, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Amicus, Inc. v. Post-Tension of Texas, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gonzalez v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- In re in the EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- LG Electronics, USA, Inc. and Rent-A-Center Texas, L.P. v. Jessica Grigg, Jennifer Almaraz and Justin Luke, Individually, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014
- Tamara Lashae Prince v. David L. Foreman D/B/A J&D Contractors and George Wesley Hair, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Tamara Lashae Prince v. David L. Foreman D/B/A J&D Contractors and George Wesley Hair, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.